Clinical framework

Process-Based Music Therapy

A proposed clinical framework for what PBMT is, how it works, and how it can be operationalised — updated as the research develops.

Close-up of a djembe drum skin and rope tuning

Whilst more research is done on PBMT, below is the proposed clinical framework. It currently serves as the main hypothesis to be tested for what PBMT is, how it works, and how it can be operationalised. As more studies are completed, it will be updated to reflect what has, or hasn’t been found, and add in references.

1. Core Definition & Scope

Process-Based Music Therapy (PBMT) is an idiographic, functionally anchored clinical framework that targets core social and psychological processes (such as psychological flexibility, relational framing, and emotion regulation) through active and receptive musical interaction.

PBMT explicitly conceptualises music as a form of verbal behavior. Because musical interactions are operant, socially mediated, and context-dependent, they can be evaluated through a functional contextualist lens in the exact same manner as linguistic language.

This means that PBMT does not operate as a protocol-driven or syndromal model of music therapy, or any other such model that pairs interventions with DSM/ICD diagnostic categories. It is not positing to replace those models, however it provides a useful framework for working with all diagnoses and ages. Within this arena, clinicians observe behavioural function, formulate process-level imbalances, and adapt musical affordances contextually to promote psychological change across both musical and linguistic domains towards more meaningful and workable ways of living.

2. Philosophical & Epistemological Foundation

PBMT is explicitly rooted in functional contextualism and Relational Frame Theory (RFT).

Functional contextualism is the evaluation of all verbal behaviour, whether linguistic (words, syntax) or musical (pitch, rhythm, timbre, dynamic contour, inter-subjective timing), by its function within a historic and immediate context, rather than its topography, aesthetic form, or adherence to formal rules. Clinical targets are understood as functional adaptation strategies.

Relational Frame Theory (RFT) is understood within PBMT to be the driving theory behind meaning-making and change within music therapy, with musical acts representing non-linguistic yet fully verbal relational framing. Musical stimuli function as both non-arbitrary and arbitrarily applicable relational stimuli. Musical interaction serves as a non-linguistic verbal arena where transformation of stimulus functions (the changing of relationship/feeling to a contextual cue) occurs rapidly, either modifying or directly altering rigid, rule-governed linguistic behaviour, or forming new, non-linguistic relational networks in which non-linguistic populations can begin to understand their sense of self and relation to others.

In other words, PBMT understands music therapy to be the non-linguistic application of RFT to bring about meaningful change within a therapeutic environment.

Section 3

Target Processes & Musical Affordances

PBMT organises clinical targets around core psychological processes, mapping each directly to the unique affordances of musical verbal behavior.

Cognitive / Relational

Cognitive Defusion & De-literalisation

Musical affordance / clinical vehicle

Observing linguistic thoughts and/or experiences as transient auditory events, rather than literal imperatives, through relational framing.

Affective

Experiential Acceptance & Tolerance

Musical affordance / clinical vehicle

Experiencing acoustic dissonance, unexpected silence, or emotional intensity within a structured musical container without engaging in avoidance behaviors.

Attentional

Flexible Present-Moment Awareness

Musical affordance / clinical vehicle

Tracking, entraining to, and modulating real-time acoustic shifts, turn-taking, and timbre changes in shared play.

Self-Dimension

Self-as-Context (Transcendental Self)

Musical affordance / clinical vehicle

Cultivating the perspective of the “listener/musician” distinct from generated musical/linguistic content or transient emotional reactions.

Behavioral

Repertoire Variability & Committed Action

Musical affordance / clinical vehicle

Expanding behavioral options during active playing (e.g., breaking rigid rhythmic patterns) and aligning sonic co-creation with personal values.

Physiological

Autonomic Regulation & Entrainment

Musical affordance / clinical vehicle

Utilising acoustic tempo, rhythm, and dynamic envelope to influence physiological arousal, vagal tone, and somatic grounding.

Section 4

Functional Assessment Architecture

PBMT replaces static diagnostic categorization with a functional assessment model that translates live musical verbal behaviors into observable Functional Anchors.

AnchorObservable Musical Verbal Behavior
InferenceInferred Function
TargetTarget Process Imbalance

Primary Functional Anchors

01

Rigidity vs. Variability in Play

Holding obsessively to a fixed tempo, repetitive scale, or narrow dynamic range functions as experiential avoidance of uncertainty or loss of control.

Target processes
  • Repertoire Variability & Committed Action
  • Experiential Acceptance & Tolerance

02

Relational Dominance / Withdrawal

Overpowering co-created sound or immediately ceasing play when another participant enters functions as avoidance of interpersonal vulnerability or threat.

Target processes
  • Flexible Present-Moment Awareness
  • Self-as-Context (Transcendental Self)

03

Disorganising Impulse Spikes

Unmodulated volume bursts or sudden instrument switching in response to acoustic shifts function as difficulty regulating autonomic distress.

Target process
  • Autonomic Regulation & Entrainment

04

Adherence to Musical Rules

High distress or cessation of play following a “wrong note” functions as rigid rule-governed behavior.

Target processes
  • Cognitive Defusion & De-literalisation
  • Experiential Acceptance & Tolerance

Section 5

Clinical Decision-Making Heuristic

Clinical choice in PBMT operates as a continuous, micro-analytical feedback loop during the session across all verbal behavior streams.

  1. 01

    Observe

    Track live musical and linguistic functional anchors.

  2. 02

    Formulate

    Identify target process imbalance (e.g., Avoidance).

  3. 03

    Alter Context

    Modify musical parameter (tempo, harmonic base, call-and-response structure, or silences).

  4. 04

    Evaluate

    Observe if the client’s overall behavioral repertoire expands across musical or linguistic streams.

Section 6

Idiographic Evidence & Evaluation Strategy

To establish empirical validity without relying on rigid, manualised protocols, PBMT will need to employ an idiographic, high-frequency measurement strategy.

Single-Case Experimental Designs (SCEDs)

Tracking targeted process variables within individuals across baseline, intervention, and follow-up phases.

Micro-Longitudinal Tracking

Utilising post-session or intra-session functional assessment scoring to track trajectories of change in specific process domains over time.

Process-Outcome Linkage

Demonstrating that clinical improvement occurs as a direct mathematical and clinical function of shifts in target processes (e.g., increases in musical/psychological flexibility) rather than non-specific therapeutic factors.

Working with Process-Based Music Therapy

Looking for therapy grounded in this framework, or supervision and consultation built around it? Get in touch.