Cognitive / Relational
Cognitive Defusion & De-literalisation
Musical affordance / clinical vehicle
Observing linguistic thoughts and/or experiences as transient auditory events, rather than literal imperatives, through relational framing.
Clinical framework
A proposed clinical framework for what PBMT is, how it works, and how it can be operationalised — updated as the research develops.

Whilst more research is done on PBMT, below is the proposed clinical framework. It currently serves as the main hypothesis to be tested for what PBMT is, how it works, and how it can be operationalised. As more studies are completed, it will be updated to reflect what has, or hasn’t been found, and add in references.
Process-Based Music Therapy (PBMT) is an idiographic, functionally anchored clinical framework that targets core social and psychological processes (such as psychological flexibility, relational framing, and emotion regulation) through active and receptive musical interaction.
PBMT explicitly conceptualises music as a form of verbal behavior. Because musical interactions are operant, socially mediated, and context-dependent, they can be evaluated through a functional contextualist lens in the exact same manner as linguistic language.
This means that PBMT does not operate as a protocol-driven or syndromal model of music therapy, or any other such model that pairs interventions with DSM/ICD diagnostic categories. It is not positing to replace those models, however it provides a useful framework for working with all diagnoses and ages. Within this arena, clinicians observe behavioural function, formulate process-level imbalances, and adapt musical affordances contextually to promote psychological change across both musical and linguistic domains towards more meaningful and workable ways of living.
PBMT is explicitly rooted in functional contextualism and Relational Frame Theory (RFT).
Functional contextualism is the evaluation of all verbal behaviour, whether linguistic (words, syntax) or musical (pitch, rhythm, timbre, dynamic contour, inter-subjective timing), by its function within a historic and immediate context, rather than its topography, aesthetic form, or adherence to formal rules. Clinical targets are understood as functional adaptation strategies.
Relational Frame Theory (RFT) is understood within PBMT to be the driving theory behind meaning-making and change within music therapy, with musical acts representing non-linguistic yet fully verbal relational framing. Musical stimuli function as both non-arbitrary and arbitrarily applicable relational stimuli. Musical interaction serves as a non-linguistic verbal arena where transformation of stimulus functions (the changing of relationship/feeling to a contextual cue) occurs rapidly, either modifying or directly altering rigid, rule-governed linguistic behaviour, or forming new, non-linguistic relational networks in which non-linguistic populations can begin to understand their sense of self and relation to others.
In other words, PBMT understands music therapy to be the non-linguistic application of RFT to bring about meaningful change within a therapeutic environment.
Section 3
PBMT organises clinical targets around core psychological processes, mapping each directly to the unique affordances of musical verbal behavior.
Cognitive / Relational
Musical affordance / clinical vehicle
Observing linguistic thoughts and/or experiences as transient auditory events, rather than literal imperatives, through relational framing.
Affective
Musical affordance / clinical vehicle
Experiencing acoustic dissonance, unexpected silence, or emotional intensity within a structured musical container without engaging in avoidance behaviors.
Attentional
Musical affordance / clinical vehicle
Tracking, entraining to, and modulating real-time acoustic shifts, turn-taking, and timbre changes in shared play.
Self-Dimension
Musical affordance / clinical vehicle
Cultivating the perspective of the “listener/musician” distinct from generated musical/linguistic content or transient emotional reactions.
Behavioral
Musical affordance / clinical vehicle
Expanding behavioral options during active playing (e.g., breaking rigid rhythmic patterns) and aligning sonic co-creation with personal values.
Physiological
Musical affordance / clinical vehicle
Utilising acoustic tempo, rhythm, and dynamic envelope to influence physiological arousal, vagal tone, and somatic grounding.
Section 4
PBMT replaces static diagnostic categorization with a functional assessment model that translates live musical verbal behaviors into observable Functional Anchors.
01
Holding obsessively to a fixed tempo, repetitive scale, or narrow dynamic range functions as experiential avoidance of uncertainty or loss of control.
02
Overpowering co-created sound or immediately ceasing play when another participant enters functions as avoidance of interpersonal vulnerability or threat.
03
Unmodulated volume bursts or sudden instrument switching in response to acoustic shifts function as difficulty regulating autonomic distress.
04
High distress or cessation of play following a “wrong note” functions as rigid rule-governed behavior.
Section 5
Clinical choice in PBMT operates as a continuous, micro-analytical feedback loop during the session across all verbal behavior streams.
Track live musical and linguistic functional anchors.
Identify target process imbalance (e.g., Avoidance).
Modify musical parameter (tempo, harmonic base, call-and-response structure, or silences).
Observe if the client’s overall behavioral repertoire expands across musical or linguistic streams.
Section 6
To establish empirical validity without relying on rigid, manualised protocols, PBMT will need to employ an idiographic, high-frequency measurement strategy.
Tracking targeted process variables within individuals across baseline, intervention, and follow-up phases.
Utilising post-session or intra-session functional assessment scoring to track trajectories of change in specific process domains over time.
Demonstrating that clinical improvement occurs as a direct mathematical and clinical function of shifts in target processes (e.g., increases in musical/psychological flexibility) rather than non-specific therapeutic factors.
Looking for therapy grounded in this framework, or supervision and consultation built around it? Get in touch.